Cancer

Oral Pathology & Medicine8 min read
On this page 44 sections

💡Epidemiology

  • Oral cancer accounts for approximately 3–5% of malignancies worldwide.
  • Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) accounts for approximately 90% of oral malignancies.
  • Oral cancer is the sixth most common cancer worldwide particularly prevalent in regions where tobacco and areca nut use are common.
  • Male-to-female ratio: approximately 2:1, although the difference is narrowing.
  • Peak age: 40–70 years; HPV-associated disease may affect younger patients.
  • In India, oral cancer may account for up to 30% of cancers in some populations with high gutka and betel-quid use.

💡Risk Factors

Tobacco — strongest risk factor

  • Smoking: cigarettes, bidis, cigars and pipes; risk increases with cumulative exposure.
  • Smokeless tobacco: gutka, khaini, snuff and chewing tobacco.
  • Reverse smoking: particularly associated with palatal cancer in some South Asian populations
  • Tobacco contains numerous carcinogens, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, nitrosamines and benzopyrene.

Alcohol

  • Independent risk factor, associated with approximately 2–3 times increased risk.
  • Tobacco and alcohol act synergistically, with a combined risk reported at approximately 15–30 times.
  • Alcohol acts as a solvent, increasing mucosal permeability to carcinogens.
  • Acetaldehyde, an alcohol metabolite, is directly carcinogenic.

Betel quid (paan) / areca nut

  • Major risk factor in South Asia and the Indian subcontinent.
  • May contain areca nut, lime, tobacco and other ingredients.
  • Associated with leukoplakia, oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) and oral cancer.
  • Gutka is particularly carcinogenic because of the combination of areca nut, tobacco and lime.
  • Areca nut itself is carcinogenic, even without tobacco.

💡HPV (Human Papillomavirus)

  • High-risk types: HPV-16 and HPV-18.
  • More important in oropharyngeal cancer, especially tonsillar and base-of-tongue SCC, than in conventional oral cavity SCC.
  • HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC generally has a better prognosis than HPV-negative disease.
Viral proteinMechanism
E6Promotes degradation of p53
E7Inactivates retinoblastoma protein (Rb)

Other risk factors

FactorAssociation
Chronic irritationSharp teeth, ill-fitting dentures and chronic trauma
Ultraviolet radiationLower-lip SCC, particularly the vermilion border; outdoor workers
ImmunosuppressionHIV and transplant recipients
Nutritional deficiencyIron deficiency; Plummer–Vinson syndrome is associated with postcricoid carcinoma
Previous oral cancerField cancerization and second primary tumours
Genetic alterationsp53 mutations, p16 inactivation and family history

Clinical pearl: Tobacco plus alcohol produces a synergistic increase in risk. Areca nut is carcinogenic even without tobacco. HPV-positive oropharyngeal SCC generally has a better prognosis than HPV-negative disease.

💡Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC)

Any suspicious oral ulcer persisting for more than 3 weeks requires biopsy to exclude malignancy

Common sites

  1. Lateral border of tongue — most common intraoral site
  2. Floor of mouth.
  3. Lower lip, particularly the vermilion border.
  4. Retromolar trigone/posterior mandibular gingiva.
  5. Buccal mucosa, particularly in betel-quid users.
  6. Hard palate and upper gingiva.

Clinical presentation

Early signs

  • Non-healing ulcer persisting more than 3 weeks.
  • White patch (leukoplakia) or red patch (erythroplakia).
  • Painless lump or mucosal thickening.
  • Numbness or paraesthesia of the lip, chin or tongue.

Advanced signs

  • Indurated ulcer with rolled or everted margins.
  • Fixation to underlying tissues.
  • Bleeding, pain, dysphagia or odynophagia.
  • Trismus due to invasion of pterygoid or other masticatory muscles.
  • Cervical lymphadenopathy, classically hard, fixed and non-tender.
  • Weight loss and cachexia.

Histopathology

GradeHistological featuresPrognosis
Well differentiatedKeratin pearls, intercellular bridges, minimal pleomorphismBest
Moderately differentiatedReduced keratinization, greater pleomorphism and increased mitosesIntermediate
Poorly differentiatedMinimal keratinization, marked pleomorphism and numerous mitosesWorst

Invasion pattern

  • Cohesive tumour fronts generally have a more favourable pattern.
  • Infiltrative cords and individual tumour cells are associated with more aggressive behaviour.

💡TNM Staging

T classification: Primary tumour size and depth of invasion

StageCriteria
TisCarcinoma in situ
T1Tumour ≤2 cm and DOI ≤5 mm
T2Tumour ≤2 cm with DOI >5–10 mm, OR tumour >2–4 cm with DOI ≤10 mm
T3Tumour >4 cm OR DOI >10 mm
T4aModerately advanced disease: invasion of cortical bone, maxillary sinus or skin of face
T4bVery advanced disease: invasion of masticator space, pterygoid plates, skull base or encasement of internal carotid artery

Depth of invasion (DOI)

  • DOI is measured from the basement membrane of adjacent normal mucosa to the deepest point of tumour invasion.
  • DOI is different from tumour thickness.

Exam pearl: DOI greater than 10 mm automatically places an oral cavity tumour in T3, unless a higher T category applies.

N classification: Regional lymph nodes

StageDescription
N0No regional lymph node metastasis
N1Single ipsilateral node ≤3 cm, ENE negative
N2aSingle ipsilateral node 3–6 cm, ENE negative, or selected smaller-node disease with ENE positive
N2bMultiple ipsilateral nodes, none >6 cm, ENE negative
N2cBilateral or contralateral nodes, none >6 cm, ENE negative
N3aAny node >6 cm, ENE negative
N3bAny node with extranodal extension or other specified advanced nodal disease

ENE = extranodal extension, where tumour extends beyond the lymph node capsule.

M classification: Distant metastasis

StageDescription
M0No distant metastasis
M1Distant metastasis, e.g., lung, liver or bone

N classification — general regional lymph node

CodeMeaning
N0No regional lymph node metastasis
N1Single ipsilateral node ≤3 cm, ENE negative
N2aSingle ipsilateral node 3–6 cm, ENE negative, or selected smaller-node disease with ENE positive
N2bMultiple ipsilateral nodes, none >6 cm, ENE negative
N2cBilateral or contralateral nodes, none >6 cm, ENE negative
N3aAny node >6 cm, ENE negative
N3bAny node with extranodal extension or other specified advanced nodal disease

M classification

CodeMeaning
M0No distant metastasis
M1Distant metastasis, e.g., lung, liver or bone

Histopathological grade

CodeGrade
G1Well differentiated
G2Moderately differentiated
G3Poorly differentiated
G4Undifferentiated

Residual tumour after surgery

CodeMeaning
R0No residual tumour; clear margins
R1Microscopic residual tumour at margin
R2Macroscopic residual tumour visible
RxResidual tumour cannot be assessed

💡TNM stage grouping: general snapshot

StageGeneral criteria
IT1 N0 M0
IIT2 N0 M0
IIIT3 N0 M0 or selected T1–T3 N1 M0
IVASelected T4a or N2 disease
IVBT4b, N3 or other specified advanced disease
IVCAny T, any N, M1

💡Spread of Oral Cancer

Local spread

  • Direct invasion of adjacent muscle, bone, nerve and skin.
  • Perineural spread may occur along the inferior alveolar nerve, causing numbness of the chin or lower lip.
  • Mandibular invasion is particularly relevant in floor-of-mouth and gingival SCC.

Lymphatic spread

  • Level I–II nodes are commonly involved first.
  • Tongue lesions drain to submandibular and upper deep cervical nodes.
  • Floor-of-mouth lesions commonly drain to submandibular nodes.
  • Lip lesions commonly drain to submental and submandibular nodes.
  • Midline lesions of the tongue or floor of mouth may spread bilaterally.

Haematogenous spread

  • Usually a late manifestation.
  • Most common distant metastatic site: lung.
  • Other sites: liver and bone.
  • Chest X-ray or CT can be used to assess pulmonary metastasis.

💡Verrucous Carcinoma

Definition and behaviour

  • Well-differentiated variant of SCC.
  • Low-grade malignancy.
  • Strongly associated with smokeless tobacco.

Clinical features

  • Large, exophytic, cauliflower-like or warty white mass.
  • Common sites: buccal mucosa and gingiva, especially at the tobacco-placement site.
  • Locally aggressive but rarely metastasizes.
  • Tumour pushes adjacent tissues rather than infiltrating them.

Histopathology

  • Well-differentiated squamous epithelium.
  • Minimal cytological atypia.
  • Marked hyperkeratosis.
  • Broad, bulbous rete ridges with a pushing invasion pattern.
  • Church-spire keratosis may be seen.

Treatment

  • Surgical excision with wide margins.
  • Radiotherapy has historically been controversial because of concerns about anaplastic transformation; more recent evidence suggests this is uncommon.

Prognosis

  • Excellent
  • Recurrence can occur if margins are inadequate.

💡Investigations and Diagnosis

Biopsy

  • Incisional biopsy from the most suspicious area.
  • Include the lesion edge and adjacent normal tissue.
  • In mixed lesions, target the red or indurated area.
  • Avoid sampling only the necrotic centre because this may be nondiagnostic.

Imaging

InvestigationPurpose
OPGAssess mandibular bone invasion; may show moth-eaten radiolucency
CT scanPrimary tumour extent, cortical bone involvement and nodal staging
MRISoft tissue extent, perineural invasion and marrow involvement
PET-CTDistant metastases, second primary tumours and recurrence monitoring
Chest X-ray/CTScreen for pulmonary metastasis
Ultrasound-guided FNACAssess cervical lymph nodes

Tumour markers

  • SCC antigen: not routinely used.
  • p53 expression: may have prognostic relevance.
  • Ki-67 proliferation index: may provide prognostic information.
  • p16 immunohistochemistry: surrogate marker for HPV-associated oropharyngeal SCC.

💡Management

Surgery

Primary treatment for most resectable oral cavity SCC, particularly stages I–IVA when surgery is appropriate.

  • Wide local excision with adequate margins.
  • Histological margin assessment is essential.
  • The clinical margin target of at least 1–1.5 cm to account for tissue shrinkage; final adequacy is determined histologically.

Mandibulectomy

ProcedureIndication
Marginal mandibulectomySelected superficial mandibular involvement when mandibular continuity can be preserved
Segmental mandibulectomyFull-thickness mandibular involvement requiring removal of a segment

Maxillectomy

  • Used for selected palatal or maxillary tumours involving the maxilla.

Neck dissection

Indications include clinically involved nodes or elective treatment in selected high-risk primary sites.

TypeDescription
Selective neck dissectionRemoves selected nodal levels; levels I–III are commonly addressed in appropriate oral cavity cases
Modified radical neck dissectionRemoves lymphatic tissue while preserving one or more of the spinal accessory nerve, sternocleidomastoid muscle and internal jugular vein
Radical neck dissectionRemoves lymphatic tissue with the sternocleidomastoid muscle, spinal accessory nerve and internal jugular vein; now rarely required

Reconstruction

Free-flap reconstruction may be needed after extensive resection.

Radiotherapy

Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy

  • Advanced-stage disease.
  • Positive or close margins, depending on final pathology.
  • Perineural invasion.
  • Nodal disease and other adverse pathological features.

Definitive radiotherapy

  • Selected unresectable tumours.
  • Patients unsuitable for surgery.

Side effects

  • Mucositis.
  • Xerostomia.
  • Osteoradionecrosis (ORN).
  • Radiation caries.
  • Trismus.
  • Taste loss.

Chemotherapy

RegimenRole
Concurrent cisplatin + radiotherapyCommon approach for appropriate advanced disease
Cisplatin + 5-FU + docetaxel (TPF)Induction chemotherapy in selected patients

Chemotherapy alone is generally not curative for localized oral cavity SCC.

Targeted therapy and immunotherapy

AgentMechanism/use
CetuximabEGFR monoclonal antibody; selected head and neck cancer settings, including some patients unsuitable for cisplatin
PembrolizumabPD-1 checkpoint inhibitor for selected recurrent/metastatic disease
NivolumabPD-1 checkpoint inhibitor for selected recurrent/metastatic disease

Clinical pearl: Surgery is the primary treatment for most resectable oral SCC. Adjuvant treatment is determined by final stage and histopathological risk factors.