Biostats

On this page 17 sections
Reminders
Think of parametric tests as the "normal-data family":
t-test → ANOVA → Pearson
And their common non-parametric counterparts:
Mann–Whitney → Wilcoxon → Kruskal–Wallis → Spearman
Types of scales
| Scale | What the respondent does | Example | Key idea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likert scale | Indicates degree of agreement | Strongly agree → Agree → Neutral → Disagree → Strongly disagree | Agreement |
| Guttman scale | Responds to items arranged in increasing order of intensity | Would you accept dental checkup? → treatment? → extraction? | Cumulative |
| Semantic differential / adjective scale | Rates something between two opposite adjectives | Good ⟵ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ⟶ Bad | Opposite adjectives |
| Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | Marks a point on a continuous line | No pain ───────── Worst pain | Continuous intensity |
| Rating scale | Gives a numerical rating | Satisfaction: 1–5 | Degree/rating |
| Nominal scale | Chooses a category | Blood group: A/B/AB/O | Names only |
| Ordinal scale | Chooses an ordered category | Mild/Moderate/Severe | Rank/order |
| Numerical rating scale | Gives a number to describe intensity | Pain = 0–10 | Numeric intensity |
Null Hypothesis Error
| Reality | Study says: No difference (H₀ accepted/not rejected) | Study says: Difference (H₀ rejected) |
|---|---|---|
| Actually NO difference | ✅ Correct | ❌ Type I error |
| Actually a DIFFERENCE | ❌ Type II error | ✅ Correct |
Type I = False Positive
You say there is a difference, but there actually isn't.
Type II = False Negative
You say there is no difference, but there actually is.
Formulas




Graphs
| Graph | Use it when… | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Bar chart | Categorical data | Number of patients by blood group |
| Histogram ⭐ | Continuous numerical data grouped into intervals | Age distribution of patients |
| Line graph ⭐ | Showing change/trend over time | Incidence of caries from 2015–2025 |
| Pie chart | Showing proportions/percentages of a whole | % of patients by smoking status |
| Scatter plot ⭐ | Relationship/correlation between 2 numerical variables | Age vs number of missing teeth |
| Frequency polygon | Comparing frequency distributions | Age distribution of males vs females |
| Box-and-whisker plot | Showing distribution, median, spread & outliers | DMFT scores in different groups |
| Stem-and-leaf plot | Displaying numerical data while retaining individual values | Distribution of ages in a small sample |
| Pictogram | Simple presentation using symbols/pictures | Number of children receiving dental screening |
Validity / prerequisites of common statistical tests
| Test | Use when | Important prerequisites / conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Z test – mean | Compare mean with reference / another mean | Continuous data; approximately normal or large sample; population SD usually known |
| One-sample t-test | 1 sample mean vs known value | Continuous data; observations independent; data approximately normal; population SD unknown |
| Independent t-test ⭐ | Compare means of 2 independent groups | Continuous outcome; independent observations; approximately normal within groups; groups independent; equal variance for the classical pooled version |
| Paired t-test ⭐ | Compare means before vs after in same subjects | Paired observations; continuous outcome; differences between pairs approximately normal |
| ANOVA ⭐ | Compare means of ≥3 independent groups | Continuous outcome; independent observations; approximately normal within groups; similar/equal variances |
| Chi-square test ⭐⭐⭐ | Association between categorical variables | Categories mutually exclusive; observations independent; adequate expected frequencies |
| Fisher's exact test | Categorical data with small expected frequencies | Independent categorical observations; particularly useful when Chi-square expected counts are too small |
| Pearson correlation ⭐ | Relationship between 2 continuous variables | Continuous variables; approximately linear relationship; independent observations; approximately normal/bivariate normal data for usual significance testing; no major outliers |
| Spearman correlation | Relationship between ranked/non-normal variables | Ordinal or continuous data; independent observations; monotonic relationship |
| Mann–Whitney U | 2 independent groups, non-parametric | Independent observations; ordinal/continuous outcome; distributions suitable for comparison |
| Wilcoxon signed-rank | Paired data, non-parametric | Paired observations; differences can be ranked; approximately symmetric differences for the usual interpretation |
| Kruskal–Wallis | ≥3 independent groups, non-parametric | Independent observations; ordinal/continuous outcome |
| McNemar test | Paired categorical data, usually before/after | Paired/dichotomous data; same subjects measured twice |
Association vs Correlation
| Association | Correlation | |
|---|---|---|
| Meaning | Whether two variables are related | How strongly and in what direction two variables move together |
| Usually used for | Categorical variables | Numerical variables |
| Example | Smoking ↔ periodontal disease | Age ↔ number of missing teeth |
| Common test | Chi-square | Pearson / Spearman correlation |
| Result | χ², p-value, etc. | r from −1 to +1 |
| Tells direction? | Usually not | Yes |
| Tells strength? | Not usually with basic Chi-square | Yes |
Sampling
Methods
Sampling = selecting a subset of people from a population.
| Method | How it works | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Simple random | Everyone has equal chance | Randomly select 100 patients |
| Systematic | Select every kth person | Every 10th patient |
| Stratified | Divide into strata, sample from each | Sample males and females separately |
| Cluster | Randomly select entire groups/clusters | Select 5 schools and survey all students |
| Multistage | Sampling done in several stages | Province → district → school → students |
| Convenience | Select whoever is easily available | Patients currently in your clinic |
| Purposive | Researcher deliberately selects specific subjects | Select experts in dental public health |
| Snowball | Existing participants recruit others | Useful for hard-to-reach populations |
Ages
| Age group | Age |
|---|---|
| Neonate / Neonatal period ⭐ | Birth–<28 days |
| Infant ⭐ | <1 year |
| Early infancy | Birth–<6 months |
| Late infancy | 6 months–<1 year |
| Toddler | 1–3 years |
| Preschool child | 3–5 years |
| Child | <10 years (context-dependent) |
| Adolescent ⭐ | 10–19 years |
| Teenager | 13–19 years |
| Young adult | 20–24 years (often used in public health) |
| Adult | ≥18 years legally; epidemiological definitions vary |
| Older adult / Elderly ⭐ | ≥60 years in many WHO/public-health contexts |
| Very old / Oldest old | ≥80 years |
MEAN, MEDIAN AND MODE
| Measure | Definition | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | Sum of observations divided by the number of observations | Average DMFT score |
| Median | Middle observation after arranging values in order | Middle patient age |
| Mode | Most frequently occurring observation | Most common type of restoration |
Example: Data = 2, 3, 3, 4, 18
Mean = (2 + 3 + 3 + 4 + 18) / 5 = 6
Median = 3
Mode = 3
The extreme value of 18 pulls the mean upward, while the median remains 3.
NORMAL DISTRIBUTION AND SKEWNESS
Normal distribution
A normal distribution is symmetrical and bell-shaped.
Characteristics:
- Mean = Median = Mode.
- The curve is symmetrical around the mean.
- Most observations lie close to the mean.
- Fewer observations occur as we move farther from the mean.
- Many parametric statistical tests assume normally distributed data or normally distributed model residuals.
Positive skew (right-skewed distribution)
Definition: A distribution with a long tail toward the right.
Characteristics:
- Mean > Median > Mode.
- High values pull the mean toward the right tail.
- Examples: Income, waiting times, hospital length of stay.
- A few very high values may substantially increase the mean and SD.
Negative skew (left-skewed distribution)
Definition: A distribution with a long tail toward the left.
Characteristics:
- Mean < Median < Mode.
- Low values pull the mean toward the left tail.
- Example: An easy examination in which most candidates score highly but a few score very poorly.
Effect of skewness on mean, median, mode and standard deviation
| Distribution | Relationship of Mean, Median and Mode | Effect on SD |
|---|---|---|
| Normal/symmetrical | Mean = Median = Mode | SD reflects spread around the mean |
| Positive/right skew | Usually Mean > Median > Mode | High values in the right tail may increase SD |
| Negative/left skew | Usually Mean < Median < Mode | Low values in the left tail may increase SD |
| Distribution with extreme outliers | Mean may be pulled toward the outliers | SD may increase substantially |
Skewness does not determine standard deviation by itself. SD measures the spread of observations around the mean, not the direction of skewness.
- A skewed dataset can have either a small or a large SD.
- Two datasets can have the same SD but different distribution shapes.
- Extreme outliers often increase SD because deviations from the mean are squared.
- For markedly skewed data, median and interquartile range (IQR) are often more appropriate than mean and SD.
MEASURES OF DISPERSION
| Measure | Definition | Important Point |
|---|---|---|
| Range | Maximum − minimum | Simple but very sensitive to extreme values |
| Variance | Average squared deviation from the mean, with different formulas for samples and populations | Expressed in squared units |
| Standard deviation (SD) | Square root of variance | Measures spread around the mean |
| Interquartile range (IQR) | Q3 − Q1 | Spread of the middle 50%; relatively resistant to outliers |
| Standard error (SE) | Standard deviation of a statistic's sampling distribution | Measures precision of an estimate, not variation among individuals |
For a sample mean:
SE = SD / √n
Where:
- SD = Sample standard deviation
- n = Sample size
Difference between SD and SE:
- SD describes variability among individual observations.
- SE describes the uncertainty or precision of an estimated statistic.
- Increasing sample size reduces the SE of the mean, all else equal.
- Increasing sample size does not necessarily reduce the population's SD.